Share

Viewed 935 times

This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison....

    Glander This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:15:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 893 of 1298
    Since 9/30/2010

      read this, it's short - very interesting.
     
    Stolen SSN# 042-68-4425
     
    An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose
    Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama: Was
    Jean Paul Ludwig , who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the
    United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 ( Obama's
    current SSN ) rec'd on or about March 1977.
     
    Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut . Because of that,
    his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few
    reserved for Connecticut residents.
     
    Obama  never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no
    reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None
    whatsoever!
     
    Now comes the best part! Ludwig spent the final months of his life in
    Hawaii, where he died.
     
    Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked
    part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and
    therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.
     
    The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's
    death, and because he  never received Social Security benefits there
    were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.
     
    The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not
    a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a
    citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scoured
    the probate records until she found someone who died who was not
    receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwigs
    Connecticut SSN for Obama.
     

    out4good3 Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:17:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 964 of 1037
    Since 1/13/2002

    Rolls Eyes!!!!!!

    undercover Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:19:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit


    Morocco

    Post 13235 of 13624
    Since 9/25/2002
    No Room For George Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:21:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 2137 of 2620
    Since 4/25/2011
    james_woods Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:23:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit


    United States Texas

    Post 7671 of 10366
    Since 10/26/2005

    Rolls Eyes!!!!!!

    Throws up in mouth a little, and spits into non-recycle wastebasket.

    Glander Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:25:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 895 of 1298
    Since 9/30/2010

    what the hell?

    put it in the Bush Lied, they died file.

    thetrueone Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:27:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit


    Canada British Columbia

    Post 5498 of 6159
    Since 9/18/2006

    Stupidity has no bounds  

    james_woods Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:27:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit


    United States Texas

    Post 7672 of 10366
    Since 10/26/2005

    what the hell?

    Coming soon to the conspiracy fetish room - ALIEN ABDUCTION!!!
    wha happened? Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:31:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit


    United States California

    Post 5871 of 8338
    Since 10/2/2004

    What I find funny is that everyone thinks they are smarter than the govt on this issue. Apparently the govt doesn't know how to google anything, or check things on snopes. This is tiring at best. But what I wanted to post here, was not an answer to this latest dribble, but the fact that everyone involved in introducing these stupid threads are just sitting back and laughing because they're just "FUCKING WITH YOU". And doing a good job of it I may add. Some of the stuff I've seen posted served no purpose other than pissing people off and then waste their time by addressing it.

     

    undercover Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:34:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit


    Morocco

    Post 13238 of 13624
    Since 9/25/2002

    You're absolutely right, WH...

    So I proclaim this thread hi-jacked in the name of the beer fairy...

     

    designs Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:34:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 9124 of 10891
    Since 6/17/2009

    12 Step Programs now forming.

    Dagney Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:46:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit


    United States California

    Post 3367 of 3629
    Since 8/14/2006

    Oh for Pete's sake. 

    Glander Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:46:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 896 of 1298
    Since 9/30/2010

    Since I am not and have never been a subscriber to the "Birther" story, I think my thread should be read in the spirit of the title.

    Glander Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:51:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 897 of 1298
    Since 9/30/2010

    FWY

    As far as wasting anybody's time I apologize if I have kept any of you from a Obamacare argument thread. If I pissed anyone off, I'll try to live with the guilt.

    thetrueone Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:52:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit


    Canada British Columbia

    Post 5500 of 6159
    Since 9/18/2006

    Glad you cleared that up Glander, people here we're starting think your nuts  

     

    But I do believe in the beer fairy

    Glander Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:00:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 898 of 1298
    Since 9/30/2010

    james woods - Throws up in mouth a little, and spits into non-recycle wastebasket

    LOL.

    arko_n9ne Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:30:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 92 of 101
    Since 12/17/2011

    i was born in connecticut. raised and lived there with a smile for the first 19 years of my life.

    i have an 043 social security number.

    when i run a credit check i find there is a mexican woman in california with my social security number. now instinctively i think identity theft.

    doing some phone calls and emailing i learned she is a california native. she got her social in connecticut when she was younger. they gave her mine.

     

    the difficulty in proving identity theft is that this mistake happens so often that its near impossible to differentiate the two events.

    so any who try to discredit obama or push that foreign born nonsense can save it for indoctrinating their kids.

    not saying its the posters intent to push this claim as itd already been explained by him. but someone will come across this thread and try to use that nonsense as a viable argument for denouncing the president.

    ziddina Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:38:00 GMT (2/6/2012) edit




    Post 8421 of 10611
    Since 4/8/2009

    "Since I am not and have never been a subscriber to the "Birther" story, I think my thread should be read in the spirit of the title.  ..."  Glander

    (thread title:) "This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison...."  Glander

    Well.... 

    Since the "birthers" are all pasty-white Republicans.... 

    Glander Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:07:00 GMT (2/7/2012) edit




    Post 901 of 1298
    Since 9/30/2010

    zid- you sound kind of racist, what?

    ziddina Re: This makes the "birther" issue pale by comparison.... posted Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:13:00 GMT (2/7/2012) edit




    Post 8426 of 10611
    Since 4/8/2009

    Yesssss.....

    "Because, for too long, Puerto Rican women have had their BOOT on the NECK of the White Man..."  [Bill Maher]

      Close

      Confirm ...